supabasevswyoming-piper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| supabase | wyoming-piper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 92/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 40 in Database Management | #7 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 114 288 | 218 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 540 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 15 |
| Latest release | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 | v2.5.2 · 11 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 52/100 for wyoming-piper, so it is the safer default.
wyoming-piper ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.
If you want the quickest setup, wyoming-piper is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 540 stars in 30 days).
supabase details →wyoming-piper details →
Swap a project
Keep supabase, compare it with
Keep wyoming-piper, compare it with