supabasevsWeb Rendering Proxy (WRP)
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| supabase | Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 92/100 | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 40 in Database Management | #11 of 25 in Proxy |
| GitHub stars | 114 268 | 1 306 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 520 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 4 |
| Latest release | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 | 4.10.3 · 23 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 53/100 for Web Rendering Proxy (WRP), so it is the safer default.
supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Web Rendering Proxy (WRP).
If you want the quickest setup, Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 520 stars in 30 days).
supabase details →Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) details →
Swap a project
Keep supabase, compare it with
Keep Web Rendering Proxy (WRP), compare it with