# supabase vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | supabase | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 92/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 40 in Database Management | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 114 245 ✓ | 8 651 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 536 ✓ | +156 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

supabase scores 92/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.

supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.

supabase is growing faster right now (+3 536 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [supabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/supabase-vs-workout-cool