# supabase vs woodpecker-ci

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | supabase | woodpecker-ci |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 92/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 40 in Database Management | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 114 252 ✓ | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 543 ✓ | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

supabase scores 92/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.

woodpecker-ci ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.

If you want the quickest setup, woodpecker-ci is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.

supabase is growing faster right now (+3 543 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [supabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase.md)
- [woodpecker-ci](https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/supabase-vs-woodpecker-ci