# supabase vs Winter CMS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | supabase | Winter CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 92/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 40 in Database Management | #16 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 114 271 ✓ | 1 522 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 523 ✓ | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 | v1.2.14 · 19 Aug 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

supabase scores 92/100 against 62/100 for Winter CMS, so it is the safer default.

supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Winter CMS.

If you want the quickest setup, Winter CMS is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.

supabase is growing faster right now (+3 523 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [supabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase.md)
- [Winter CMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/winter-cms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/winter-cms.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/supabase-vs-winter-cms