# supabase vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | supabase | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 92/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 40 in Database Management | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 114 252 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 543 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

supabase scores 92/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.

supabase is growing faster right now (+3 543 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [supabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/supabase-vs-windows-arm