supabasevsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| supabase | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 92/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 40 in Database Management | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 114 252 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 543 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 543 stars in 30 days).
supabase details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep supabase, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with