supabasevsWebSSH
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| supabase | WebSSH | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 92/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 40 in Database Management | #2 of 6 in SSH |
| GitHub stars | 114 255 | 224 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 546 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 | v2.6.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 50/100 for WebSSH, so it is the safer default.
WebSSH ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.
If you want the quickest setup, WebSSH is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 546 stars in 30 days).
supabase details →WebSSH details →
Swap a project
Keep supabase, compare it with
Keep WebSSH, compare it with