supabasevswanderer
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| supabase | wanderer | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 92/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 40 in Database Management | #7 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 114 252 | 4 030 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 543 | +131 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 | v0.21.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 64/100 for wanderer, so it is the safer default.
wanderer ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.
If you want the quickest setup, wanderer is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 543 stars in 30 days).
supabase details →wanderer details →
Swap a project
Keep supabase, compare it with
Keep wanderer, compare it with