# supabase vs 墨台 · VibeHolding

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | supabase | 墨台 · VibeHolding |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 92/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 40 in Database Management | #24 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 114 285 ✓ | 186 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 537 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

supabase scores 92/100 against 45/100 for 墨台 · VibeHolding, so it is the safer default.

supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for 墨台 · VibeHolding.

If you want the quickest setup, 墨台 · VibeHolding is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.

supabase is growing faster right now (+3 537 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [supabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase.md)
- [墨台 · VibeHolding](https://selfhost.directory/project/vibe-holding) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/vibe-holding.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/supabase-vs-vibe-holding