# supabase vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | supabase | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 92/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 40 in Database Management | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 114 252 ✓ | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 543 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

supabase scores 92/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

UUSEC WAF ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.

If you want the quickest setup, UUSEC WAF is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.

supabase is growing faster right now (+3 543 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [supabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/supabase-vs-uusec-waf