# supabase vs unraid-config-guardian

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | supabase | unraid-config-guardian |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 92/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 40 in Database Management | #38 of 46 in Backup |
| GitHub stars | 114 286 ✓ | 171 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 538 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 8 |
| Latest release | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 ✓ | v1.6.1 · 16 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

supabase scores 92/100 against 46/100 for unraid-config-guardian, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, unraid-config-guardian is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.

supabase is growing faster right now (+3 538 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [supabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase.md)
- [unraid-config-guardian](https://selfhost.directory/project/unraid-config-guardian) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unraid-config-guardian.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/supabase-vs-unraid-config-guardian