# supabase vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | supabase | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 92/100 ✓ | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 40 in Database Management | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 114 278 ✓ | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 530 ✓ | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

supabase scores 92/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.

supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

supabase is growing faster right now (+3 530 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [supabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/supabase-vs-tube-archivist