# supabase vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | supabase | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 92/100 ✓ | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 40 in Database Management | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 114 252 | 117 750 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 543 | +5 391 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

supabase scores 92/100 against 86/100 for TradingAgents, so it is the safer default.

TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.

If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.

## Details

- [supabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/supabase-vs-tradingagents