# supabase vs Tinystatus

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | supabase | Tinystatus |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 92/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 40 in Database Management | #37 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 114 255 ✓ | 515 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 546 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

supabase scores 92/100 against 45/100 for Tinystatus, so it is the safer default.

supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Tinystatus.

If you want the quickest setup, Tinystatus is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.

supabase is growing faster right now (+3 546 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [supabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase.md)
- [Tinystatus](https://selfhost.directory/project/tinystatus) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tinystatus.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/supabase-vs-tinystatus