supabasevsteslamateapi
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| supabase | teslamateapi | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 92/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 40 in Database Management | #3 of 5 in Vehicle Management |
| GitHub stars | 114 260 | 257 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 551 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 6 |
| Latest release | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 | v1.25.0 · 7 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 46/100 for teslamateapi, so it is the safer default.
supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for teslamateapi.
If you want the quickest setup, teslamateapi is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 551 stars in 30 days).
supabase details →teslamateapi details →
Swap a project
Keep supabase, compare it with
Keep teslamateapi, compare it with