supabasevssuper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| supabase | super | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 92/100 | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 40 in Database Management | #15 of 34 in Network Management |
| GitHub stars | 114 285 | 875 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 537 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 26 |
| Latest release | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 | rpios-v1.2.18 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 53/100 for super, so it is the safer default.
super ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.
If you want the quickest setup, super is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 537 stars in 30 days).
supabase details →super details →
Swap a project
Keep supabase, compare it with
Keep super, compare it with