# supabase-automated-self-host vs Zot Registry

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | supabase-automated-self-host | Zot Registry |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #13 of 15 in Backend as a Service | #3 of 12 in Container Registry |
| GitHub stars | 506 | 2 923 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +121 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.1.22 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Zot Registry scores 64/100 against 48/100 for supabase-automated-self-host, so it is the safer default.

Zot Registry ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for supabase-automated-self-host.

Zot Registry is growing faster right now (+121 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [supabase-automated-self-host](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase-automated-self-host) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase-automated-self-host.md)
- [Zot Registry](https://selfhost.directory/project/zot-registry) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zot-registry.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/supabase-automated-self-host-vs-zot-registry