# supabase-automated-self-host vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | supabase-automated-self-host | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 66/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #13 of 15 in Backend as a Service | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 506 | 8 652 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +153 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 48/100 for supabase-automated-self-host, so it is the safer default.

Workout.cool ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for supabase-automated-self-host.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; supabase-automated-self-host needs more configuration.

Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+153 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [supabase-automated-self-host](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase-automated-self-host) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase-automated-self-host.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/supabase-automated-self-host-vs-workout-cool