# supabase-automated-self-host vs WindowsinDocker

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | supabase-automated-self-host | WindowsinDocker |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #13 of 15 in Backend as a Service | #1 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 506 | 53 730 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +335 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

WindowsinDocker scores 83/100 against 48/100 for supabase-automated-self-host, so it is the safer default.

WindowsinDocker ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for supabase-automated-self-host.

WindowsinDocker is growing faster right now (+335 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [supabase-automated-self-host](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase-automated-self-host) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase-automated-self-host.md)
- [WindowsinDocker](https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/supabase-automated-self-host-vs-windowsindocker