supabase-automated-self-hostvsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| supabase-automated-self-host | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #13 of 15 in Backend as a Service | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 506 | 17 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 48/100 for supabase-automated-self-host, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; supabase-automated-self-host needs more configuration.
supabase-automated-self-host details →Upptime details →