# supabase-automated-self-host vs Umbraco CMS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | supabase-automated-self-host | Umbraco CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 71/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #13 of 15 in Backend as a Service | #7 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 506 | 5 278 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +23 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 27 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | release-13.16.4 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Umbraco CMS scores 71/100 against 48/100 for supabase-automated-self-host, so it is the safer default.

Umbraco CMS ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for supabase-automated-self-host.

If you want the quickest setup, supabase-automated-self-host is easier to run; Umbraco CMS needs more configuration.

Umbraco CMS is growing faster right now (+23 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [supabase-automated-self-host](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase-automated-self-host) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase-automated-self-host.md)
- [Umbraco CMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/umbraco-cms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umbraco-cms.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/supabase-automated-self-host-vs-umbraco-cms