supabase-automated-self-hostvsUmbraco CMS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| supabase-automated-self-host | Umbraco CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #13 of 15 in Backend as a Service | #7 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 506 | 5 278 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +23 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 27 |
| Latest release | — | release-13.16.4 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | C |
Which one should you pick?
Umbraco CMS scores 71/100 against 48/100 for supabase-automated-self-host, so it is the safer default.
Umbraco CMS ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for supabase-automated-self-host.
If you want the quickest setup, supabase-automated-self-host is easier to run; Umbraco CMS needs more configuration.
Umbraco CMS is growing faster right now (+23 stars in 30 days).
supabase-automated-self-host details →Umbraco CMS details →