# supabase-automated-self-host vs Typst

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | supabase-automated-self-host | Typst |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #13 of 15 in Backend as a Service | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 506 | 56 870 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +141 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Typst scores 82/100 against 48/100 for supabase-automated-self-host, so it is the safer default.

Typst ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for supabase-automated-self-host.

If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; supabase-automated-self-host needs more configuration.

Typst is growing faster right now (+141 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [supabase-automated-self-host](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase-automated-self-host) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase-automated-self-host.md)
- [Typst](https://selfhost.directory/project/typst) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typst.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/supabase-automated-self-host-vs-typst