# supabase-automated-self-host vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | supabase-automated-self-host | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #13 of 15 in Backend as a Service | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 506 | 117 928 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +5 569 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 48/100 for supabase-automated-self-host, so it is the safer default.

TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for supabase-automated-self-host.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 569 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [supabase-automated-self-host](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase-automated-self-host) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase-automated-self-host.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/supabase-automated-self-host-vs-tradingagents