supa-managervsverdaccio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| supa-manager | verdaccio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 35/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #39 of 40 in Database Management | #1 of 11 in Package Management |
| GitHub stars | 231 | 17 956 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +57 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 29 |
| Latest release | — | v7.0.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
verdaccio scores 76/100 against 35/100 for supa-manager, so it is the safer default.
verdaccio ships more often: 29 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for supa-manager.
If you want the quickest setup, verdaccio is easier to run; supa-manager needs more configuration.
verdaccio is growing faster right now (+57 stars in 30 days).
supa-manager details →verdaccio details →
Swap a project
Keep supa-manager, compare it with
Keep verdaccio, compare it with