supa-managervsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| supa-manager | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 35/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #39 of 40 in Database Management | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 231 | 17 187 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +3 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 35/100 for supa-manager, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; supa-manager needs more configuration.
Upptime is growing faster right now (+3 stars in 30 days).
supa-manager details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep supa-manager, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with