supa-managervsApache Tika
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| supa-manager | Apache Tika | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 35/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #39 of 40 in Database Management | #1 of 2 in Data Extraction |
| GitHub stars | 231 | 4 115 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Apache Tika scores 68/100 against 35/100 for supa-manager, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Apache Tika is easier to run; supa-manager needs more configuration.
Apache Tika is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).
supa-manager details →Apache Tika details →
Swap a project
Keep supa-manager, compare it with
Keep Apache Tika, compare it with