# Sunshine vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Sunshine | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 22 in Remote Desktop | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 42 754 ✓ | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 238 ✓ | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 86 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v2026.1028.122642 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Sunshine scores 84/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.

Sunshine ships more often: 86 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

If you want the quickest setup, Sunshine is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.

Sunshine is growing faster right now (+1 238 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Sunshine](https://selfhost.directory/project/sunshine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sunshine.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/sunshine-vs-tube-archivist