# Sunshine vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Sunshine | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 22 in Remote Desktop | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 42 741 | 117 816 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 265 | +5 457 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 86 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v2026.1028.122642 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 84/100 for Sunshine, so it is the safer default.

Sunshine ships more often: 86 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.

If you want the quickest setup, Sunshine is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 457 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Sunshine](https://selfhost.directory/project/sunshine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sunshine.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/sunshine-vs-tradingagents