# StreamFlow vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | StreamFlow | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 61/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #19 of 36 in Video Streaming | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 406 | 2 260 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.2 · 11 Jan 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | EJS | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 50/100 for StreamFlow, so it is the safer default.

Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for StreamFlow.

If you want the quickest setup, StreamFlow is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

## Details

- [StreamFlow](https://selfhost.directory/project/streamflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/streamflow.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/streamflow-vs-windows-arm