storjvsWBO
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| storj | WBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 3 284 | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 39 | 6 |
| Latest release | v1.165.6 · 27 Oct 2026 | v2.18.28 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
storj and WBO score the same (61/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
storj ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for WBO.
If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; storj needs more configuration.
WBO is growing faster right now (+18 stars in 30 days).
Swap a project
Keep storj, compare it with
Keep WBO, compare it with