# storj vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | storj | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 72/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 3 284 | 8 553 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 | +84 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 39 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v1.165.6 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 61/100 for storj, so it is the safer default.

storj ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+84 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [storj](https://selfhost.directory/project/storj) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/storj.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/storj-vs-tube-archivist