# storj vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | storj | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 3 284 | 117 877 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 | +5 518 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 39 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.165.6 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 61/100 for storj, so it is the safer default.

storj ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.

If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; storj needs more configuration.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 518 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [storj](https://selfhost.directory/project/storj) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/storj.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/storj-vs-tradingagents