# storj vs supabase

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | storj | supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 92/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 3 284 | 114 288 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 | +3 540 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 39 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | v1.165.6 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

supabase scores 92/100 against 61/100 for storj, so it is the safer default.

storj ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.

supabase is growing faster right now (+3 540 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [storj](https://selfhost.directory/project/storj) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/storj.md)
- [supabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/storj-vs-supabase