storjvssupabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| storj | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 3 284 | 114 271 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 | +3 523 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 39 | 8 |
| Latest release | v1.165.6 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 61/100 for storj, so it is the safer default.
storj ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 523 stars in 30 days).
storj details →supabase details →
Swap a project
Keep storj, compare it with
Keep supabase, compare it with