# Stirling-PDF vs ytdlp_web_player

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Stirling-PDF | ytdlp_web_player |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #12 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 95 280 ✓ | 809 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 318 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 25 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 | v1.3.3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 55/100 for ytdlp_web_player, so it is the safer default.

Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for ytdlp_web_player.

If you want the quickest setup, ytdlp_web_player is easier to run; Stirling-PDF needs more configuration.

Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 318 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Stirling-PDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf.md)
- [ytdlp_web_player](https://selfhost.directory/project/ytdlpwebplayer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ytdlpwebplayer.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/stirling-pdf-vs-ytdlpwebplayer