# Stirling-PDF vs εxodus

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Stirling-PDF | εxodus |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #5 of 12 in Privacy |
| GitHub stars | 95 299 ✓ | 813 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 337 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 25 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.33.0 · 13 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 56/100 for εxodus, so it is the safer default.

Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for εxodus.

If you want the quickest setup, Stirling-PDF is easier to run; εxodus needs more configuration.

Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 337 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Stirling-PDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf.md)
- [εxodus](https://selfhost.directory/project/xodus) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/xodus.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/stirling-pdf-vs-xodus