# Stirling-PDF vs wraft

> Two self-hosted [Document Management projects](https://selfhost.directory/document-management), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Stirling-PDF | wraft |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 95 252 ✓ | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 339 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 25 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Elixir |

## Which one should you pick?

Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.

Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for wraft.

If you want the quickest setup, Stirling-PDF is easier to run; wraft needs more configuration.

Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 339 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Stirling-PDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf.md)
- [wraft](https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/stirling-pdf-vs-wraft