# Stirling-PDF vs WPS Office

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Stirling-PDF | WPS Office |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #6 of 6 in Office Suites |
| GitHub stars | 95 252 ✓ | 196 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 339 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 25 ✓ | 21 |
| Latest release | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 | 11.1.0.11723-2-ls194 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Dockerfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 52/100 for WPS Office, so it is the safer default.

Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 21 for WPS Office.

Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 339 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Stirling-PDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf.md)
- [WPS Office](https://selfhost.directory/project/wps-office) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wps-office.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/stirling-pdf-vs-wps-office