# Stirling-PDF vs Wiki.js

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Stirling-PDF | Wiki.js |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #2 of 31 in Wikis |
| GitHub stars | 95 260 ✓ | 29 103 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 347 ✓ | +146 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 25 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.5.315 · 21 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 77/100 for Wiki.js, so it is the safer default.

Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Wiki.js.

If you want the quickest setup, Wiki.js is easier to run; Stirling-PDF needs more configuration.

Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 347 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Stirling-PDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf.md)
- [Wiki.js](https://selfhost.directory/project/wikijs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wikijs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/stirling-pdf-vs-wikijs