# Stirling-PDF vs Warpgate

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Stirling-PDF | Warpgate |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #11 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 95 252 ✓ | 8 159 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 339 ✓ | +199 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 25 | 33 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 | v0.30.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 75/100 for Warpgate, so it is the safer default.

Warpgate ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 25 for Stirling-PDF.

If you want the quickest setup, Warpgate is easier to run; Stirling-PDF needs more configuration.

Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 339 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Stirling-PDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf.md)
- [Warpgate](https://selfhost.directory/project/warpgate) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/warpgate.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/stirling-pdf-vs-warpgate