# Stirling-PDF vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Stirling-PDF | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 95 260 ✓ | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 347 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 25 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 347 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Stirling-PDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/stirling-pdf-vs-uusec-waf