# Stirling-PDF vs unopim

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Stirling-PDF | unopim |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #1 of 6 in Product Management |
| GitHub stars | 95 280 ✓ | 11 045 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 318 ✓ | +46 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 25 ✓ | 17 |
| Latest release | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.1.3 · 29 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 69/100 for unopim, so it is the safer default.

Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for unopim.

Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 318 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Stirling-PDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf.md)
- [unopim](https://selfhost.directory/project/unopim) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unopim.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/stirling-pdf-vs-unopim