# Stirling-PDF vs tobab

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Stirling-PDF | tobab |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 37/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #34 of 40 in Authentication |
| GitHub stars | 95 289 ✓ | 155 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 327 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 25 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 37/100 for tobab, so it is the safer default.

Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for tobab.

Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 327 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Stirling-PDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf.md)
- [tobab](https://selfhost.directory/project/tobab) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tobab.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/stirling-pdf-vs-tobab