# Stirling-PDF vs swarm-cronjob

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Stirling-PDF | swarm-cronjob |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #20 of 26 in Automation |
| GitHub stars | 95 289 ✓ | 888 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 327 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 25 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 | v1.16.1 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 51/100 for swarm-cronjob, so it is the safer default.

Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for swarm-cronjob.

If you want the quickest setup, swarm-cronjob is easier to run; Stirling-PDF needs more configuration.

Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 327 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Stirling-PDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf.md)
- [swarm-cronjob](https://selfhost.directory/project/swarm-cronjob) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/swarm-cronjob.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/stirling-pdf-vs-swarm-cronjob