# statusnook vs Traefik

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | statusnook | Traefik |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 24 in Reverse Proxy |
| GitHub stars | 988 | 65 400 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +445 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 34 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.11.60 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Traefik scores 86/100 against 51/100 for statusnook, so it is the safer default.

Traefik ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for statusnook.

If you want the quickest setup, statusnook is easier to run; Traefik needs more configuration.

Traefik is growing faster right now (+445 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [statusnook](https://selfhost.directory/project/statusnook) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/statusnook.md)
- [Traefik](https://selfhost.directory/project/traefik) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/traefik.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Kong vs Traefik](https://selfhost.directory/compare/kong-vs-traefik)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/statusnook-vs-traefik