# static_status vs unsloth

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | static_status | unsloth |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #24 of 51 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 7 in Local AI |
| GitHub stars | 732 | 78 729 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 005 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | prebuilt-wheels-cu13 · 27 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

unsloth scores 85/100 against 50/100 for static_status, so it is the safer default.

unsloth ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for static_status.

If you want the quickest setup, static_status is easier to run; unsloth needs more configuration.

unsloth is growing faster right now (+2 005 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [static_status](https://selfhost.directory/project/static-status) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/static-status.md)
- [unsloth](https://selfhost.directory/project/unsloth) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unsloth.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/static-status-vs-unsloth