# static_status vs Twenty

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | static_status | Twenty |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 84/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #24 of 51 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 21 in CRM |
| GitHub stars | 732 | 60 023 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +2 635 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | twenty/v2.52.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Twenty scores 84/100 against 50/100 for static_status, so it is the safer default.

Twenty ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for static_status.

If you want the quickest setup, static_status is easier to run; Twenty needs more configuration.

Twenty is growing faster right now (+2 635 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [static_status](https://selfhost.directory/project/static-status) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/static-status.md)
- [Twenty](https://selfhost.directory/project/twenty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/twenty.md)

## Related comparisons

- [ERPNext vs Twenty](https://selfhost.directory/compare/erpnext-vs-twenty)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/static-status-vs-twenty