# Stash vs Zero-K

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Stash | Zero-K |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 142 in Media Management | #2 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 13 308 ✓ | 877 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +298 ✓ | +26 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Lua |

## Which one should you pick?

Stash scores 78/100 against 62/100 for Zero-K, so it is the safer default.

Stash ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zero-K.

Stash is growing faster right now (+298 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Stash](https://selfhost.directory/project/stash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stash.md)
- [Zero-K](https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-k) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-k.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/stash-vs-zero-k